Skip to main content

Flyers' “culture” and “tradition” mean nothing in today’s NHL

Franchises like the Flyers would be wise to prioritize adapting instead of dwelling on the past all the time.
ByKevin Lagowski
Philadelphia Flyers v Vancouver Canucks
Philadelphia Flyers v Vancouver Canucks | Jeff Vinnick/GettyImages

We all love the nostalgia of sports, fondly remembering players and teams from when we were younger. It’s what makes sports fun and cross-generational, something we can pass down. But then there’s the separate idea of "winning." Ah, that’s a whole different beast entirely, and it really has nothing to do with established culture or tradition, which is something that the Philadelphia Flyers have harped on for far too long.

From refusing to ever bump the Flying P from the front of a jersey out of reverence for Ed Snider to cultivating a decades-long procession of good old boys and former players to run the franchise, the Flyers want everything to relate back to the beginning and those halcyon days of the Orange and Black that turned an expansion team into an immediate success. But most of today’s fans weren’t alive back then. And while many of us got to at least experience the Lindros era and a few deep playoff runs earlier in our fandom, this has been a franchise lost in the woods for years.

The Flyers always seem to be living in the past, and they’ve suffered because of it.

Some of it is simply poor luck, as the Flyers’ crash-and-burn 2006-07 season netted them James van Riemsdyk instead of Patrick Kane, and then they had the misfortune of drafting Nolan Patrick ten years later. Now, a decade after that (what is it with this team and seasons ending in “7”?), we’ve reached critical mass with the whole Matvei Michkov situation.

That’s already been dissected to death this week, and it will continue to be a prominent storyline until we get some kind of resolution one way or another, but it really hearkens back to a critical issue—the Flyers’ loyalty to the crest and their blind love of guys who play “the Flyers way." This includes home-grown, long-time players like Sean Couturier and Travis Konecny, who have been here for what has indisputably been the worst 10-year period of Flyers hockey in team history.

The team has also handed out a lot of money to the likes of Noah Cates, Cam York, and Tyson Foerster. The Flyers seem so fearful of losing useful players that they ultimately fail to see how replaceable much of their skill sets would be if you could only have a few supremely talented players on the roster. Look around the league and you’ll see that the most successful organizations excel at talent evaluation and determining who they can afford to lose.

Without getting into the mechanics of how to acquire such game-altering players, the irony is that the Flyers have one right now in Matvei Michkov—an imperfect player, to be sure, but one whose skills could make him elite in the right team environment and with the right mix of players around him. Not even 200 games into his NHL career, however, Michkov has been through such turnover and turmoil that you have to ask the logical question of why the Flyers are sabotaging their best young building block. What are they trying to make him into? Didn’t they have a vision for how to use him when they drafted him and got the entire fanbase so geeked up about it for over a year?

As the situation rockets towards potentially being irreparable, it could be crippling to a Flyers club that spent a long time rebuilding good will, attained it after last season, but then immediately gave it all back and then some. Multiple franchises around the league have been mired in similar darkness for years, but at least teams like the Blackhawks and the Red Wings have some 21st-century glory that fans can fall back on when times get tough. The Flyers haven’t had that kind of success in decades, yet they continue to lean on a brand and a tradition that stopped mattering to the modern fan years ago.

Just as a team needs to adjust its style on the ice and the players it employs to carry out an effective system, the thought process behind everything should be pretty agnostic of a team’s tradition or heritage. Lean into that for your promotions and merchandise, sure, but “the Flyers way” hasn’t been conducive to winning hockey in far too long. Not every bumpy situation like Michkov’s needs to be a grand affront to "culture." How long until the Flyers finally wise up?

Add us as a preferred source on Google